Total Conservation Programs in 5th District of Ohio (Rep. Robert Latta), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,563
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 5th District of Ohio (Rep. Robert Latta) totaled $5,017,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Genelta M Levos | Paulding, OH 45879 | $13,218 |
42 | Charles Kauser Excavating Inc | Paulding, OH 45879 | $13,083 |
43 | Michael Aeschliman | Archbold, OH 43502 | $12,757 |
44 | Teresa R Detmer | Waterville, OH 43566 | $12,756 |
45 | Christine Dugas | New York, NY 10014 | $12,697 |
46 | Dietsch Enterprises LLC | Edgerton, OH 43517 | $12,592 |
47 | John Close | Edgerton, OH 43517 | $12,415 |
48 | Karen Sierer | Defiance, OH 43512 | $12,379 |
49 | Rex Sierer | Defiance, OH 43512 | $12,379 |
50 | Denver G Zeedyk | Hicksville, OH 43526 | $12,372 |
51 | Timothy L Carlin | Bryan, OH 43506 | $12,097 |
52 | Rick Welch | Grover Hill, OH 45849 | $12,093 |
53 | William Miller | Bryan, OH 43506 | $12,082 |
54 | Mark A Spangler | Oakwood, OH 45873 | $12,011 |
55 | Anthony Scantlen | Defiance, OH 43512 | $12,001 |
56 | Charles Kauser | Paulding, OH 45879 | $11,997 |
57 | Duane B Kerwin | Centerville, OH 45459 | $11,931 |
58 | 4-h Camp Palmer, Inc | Fayette, OH 43521 | $11,858 |
59 | Herald E Yenser | Oakwood, OH 45873 | $11,840 |
60 | Shininger Inc | Delta, OH 43515 | $11,701 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”