Farm Subsidy information
5th District of Ohio
(Rep. Robert Latta)
Total Subsidies in 5th District of Ohio (Rep. Robert Latta), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,035
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 5th District of Ohio (Rep. Robert Latta) totaled $17,082,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Larry Schulz | Ney, OH 43549 | $41,412 |
82 | Br Farms LLC | Defiance, OH 43512 | $41,183 |
83 | Douglas C Powell | Deshler, OH 43516 | $41,177 |
84 | Keith E Derck | Antwerp, OH 45813 | $40,487 |
85 | Gary Vollmer | Hicksville, OH 43526 | $40,374 |
86 | Andrew M Shininger | Ney, OH 43549 | $39,907 |
87 | Michael R Todd | Cecil, OH 45821 | $39,767 |
88 | Douglas C Keil | Swanton, OH 43558 | $39,489 |
89 | Brady Woolace | Defiance, OH 43512 | $39,217 |
90 | Gary J Derck | Antwerp, OH 45813 | $38,808 |
91 | Neil Fry | Montpelier, OH 43543 | $37,071 |
92 | Dustin-heller Farms LLC Heller | Alvordton, OH 43501 | $36,986 |
93 | Michael T Beck Farms Ltd | Napoleon, OH 43545 | $36,947 |
94 | Pahl Farms LLC | Defiance, OH 43512 | $36,777 |
95 | Conkey Farms LLC | Hicksville, OH 43526 | $36,745 |
96 | Curtis J Shidler | Mc Clure, OH 43534 | $36,584 |
97 | Kenneth E Ruffer | Stryker, OH 43557 | $36,237 |
98 | James C Thomas Jr | New Bavaria, OH 43548 | $35,530 |
99 | Aeschliman Family Farms LLC | Wauseon, OH 43567 | $35,282 |
100 | John Mulligan Jr | Bryan, OH 43506 | $34,755 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”