Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 6th District of Ohio (Rep. Bill Johnson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 415
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 6th District of Ohio (Rep. Bill Johnson) totaled $679,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John S Williams | Belmont, OH 43718 | $3,330 |
42 | Calvin W Householder | Hammondsville, OH 43930 | $3,164 |
43 | Ralph Malone | Ironton, OH 45638 | $3,038 |
44 | Richard T Bardall | Tippecanoe, OH 44699 | $3,000 |
45 | Richard P Cummings | Dennison, OH 44621 | $3,000 |
46 | Charles T Cleaver | Mt Pleasant, OH 43939 | $3,000 |
47 | Larry Baumberger | Beallsville, OH 43716 | $2,998 |
48 | David A Irvin | Rayland, OH 43943 | $2,969 |
49 | David Paul Lash Jr | Bridgeport, OH 43912 | $2,952 |
50 | Jerry Wildes | Barnesville, OH 43713 | $2,937 |
51 | Mike Milarcik | New Philadelphia, OH 44663 | $2,846 |
52 | Paul Higgins | Willow Wood, OH 45696 | $2,833 |
53 | Larry Bettinger | Summerfield, OH 43788 | $2,823 |
54 | Larry Norris | Kitts Hill, OH 45645 | $2,818 |
55 | Alvin Harper Jr | Kitts Hill, OH 45645 | $2,808 |
56 | G Randy Harper | Kitts Hill, OH 45645 | $2,762 |
57 | Carl Coburn | Ironton, OH 45638 | $2,751 |
58 | Ralph Crawford | Pedro, OH 45659 | $2,734 |
59 | Stephen Rubel | Lewisville, OH 43754 | $2,724 |
60 | A Thomas Albaugh | Scio, OH 43988 | $2,677 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”