Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 2nd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Markwayne Mullin), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,566
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 2nd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Markwayne Mullin) totaled $2,307,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Alsbaugh Farms LLC | Miami, OK 74354 | $14,294 |
22 | Jack Bradshaw | Grant, OK 74738 | $14,134 |
23 | William L Fansler | Welch, OK 74369 | $14,122 |
24 | David Griswold | Miami, OK 74354 | $13,093 |
25 | R Wayne Carter Jr | Calera, OK 74730 | $12,759 |
26 | Jason W Griffin | Atoka, OK 74525 | $11,897 |
27 | Sheila Cullum | Sallisaw, OK 74955 | $11,509 |
28 | Cydne Reign Proctor | De Kalb, TX 75559 | $11,384 |
29 | Mark A Scott | Hugo, OK 74743 | $11,303 |
30 | Mike Jarvis | Afton, OK 74331 | $11,142 |
31 | Donald Jack Leslie | Hugo, OK 74743 | $11,113 |
32 | Gerald Knapp | Talihina, OK 74571 | $11,113 |
33 | Carl K Carter | Finley, OK 74543 | $9,793 |
34 | Victor Ranch Partnership | Afton, OK 74331 | $9,574 |
35 | Shand Diversified | Haworth, OK 74740 | $9,458 |
36 | Gary G Hill Jr | Antlers, OK 74523 | $9,455 |
37 | Fowler R Sheffield | Vian, OK 74962 | $9,276 |
38 | Aaron Ford Alsbaugh | Miami, OK 74354 | $9,175 |
39 | Superior Sod Services, LLC | Durant, OK 74701 | $8,919 |
40 | Quapaw Nation | Quapaw, OK 74363 | $8,857 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”