Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 2nd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Markwayne Mullin), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 257
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 2nd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Markwayne Mullin) totaled $454,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Grace Baldridge | Allen, TX 75002 | $806 |
122 | Tim Allen Blankenship | Glendo, WY 82213 | $797 |
123 | Ray L Hill | Welch, OK 74369 | $770 |
124 | James L Graham | Bokchito, OK 74726 | $762 |
125 | Kd Holdings Family Limited Partership/farming Ente | Gunter, TX 75058 | $744 |
126 | Donna Jean Eads | Miami, OK 74354 | $719 |
127 | Manuel Johnson | Afton, OK 74331 | $665 |
128 | Robert J Darnell | Bartlesville, OK 74006 | $638 |
129 | Marvella Smith | Litchfield Park, AZ 85340 | $634 |
130 | Stanley E Presley | Durant, OK 74701 | $633 |
131 | Parson Family Bypass Trust | Idabel, OK 74745 | $625 |
132 | Larry Pat Frellick | Afton, OK 74331 | $623 |
133 | Janice Stone | Emory, TX 75440 | $611 |
134 | Steven L Black | Mound Valley, KS 67354 | $609 |
135 | Edna Simmons | Vinita, OK 74301 | $595 |
136 | Mary Jane Holden | Tahlequah, OK 74464 | $579 |
137 | Clarence Gordon II | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $579 |
138 | Robert G Haskell | Scammon, KS 66773 | $577 |
139 | Linda Staton | Hendrix, OK 74741 | $575 |
140 | Dustin W Jarvis | Miami, OK 74354 | $569 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”