Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 2nd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Markwayne Mullin), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 857
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 2nd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Markwayne Mullin) totaled $4,615,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Ken Whitehead Jr | Poteau, OK 74953 | $8,915 |
142 | Edna Clouse | Broken Bow, OK 74728 | $8,904 |
143 | Stephen A Goldsborough Rev Trust | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $8,865 |
144 | Patrick David Carroll | Afton, OK 74331 | $8,815 |
145 | Don Sherwood | Wyandotte, OK 74370 | $8,790 |
146 | Ricky Eugene Hill | El Reno, OK 73036 | $8,679 |
147 | A V Hayes Jr | Hugo, OK 74743 | $8,620 |
148 | Richard Hoffman | Bokoshe, OK 74930 | $8,586 |
149 | Jimmy R Abernathy | Bokoshe, OK 74930 | $8,586 |
150 | Wesley Joe King | Jay, OK 74346 | $8,582 |
151 | Tina Kay Burton | Bokoshe, OK 74930 | $8,580 |
152 | Thomas M Hines | Sallisaw, OK 74955 | $8,556 |
153 | Douglas Mulkey | Broken Bow, OK 74728 | $8,536 |
154 | Charlie Don Burton | Bokoshe, OK 74930 | $8,529 |
155 | Walter R Johnson | Garvin, OK 74736 | $8,525 |
156 | Justin Nocona Graham | Broken Bow, OK 74728 | $8,435 |
157 | Sam C Johnston | Hodgen, OK 74939 | $8,420 |
158 | Andrew Brewer | Bokoshe, OK 74930 | $8,408 |
159 | Michael G Gamble | Spiro, OK 74959 | $8,395 |
160 | Noah Glen Brown | Jay, OK 74346 | $8,391 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”