Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in 2nd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Markwayne Mullin), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 919
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in 2nd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Markwayne Mullin) totaled $3,934,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tom Handrich | Wyandotte, OK 74370 | $29,334 |
22 | Leland Tucker Cattle Co | Soper, OK 74759 | $28,998 |
23 | Jim Fobber | Kinta, OK 74552 | $26,777 |
24 | Kyle Jon Robison | Lamar, OK 74850 | $25,455 |
25 | Steve Munnerlyn | Broken Bow, OK 74728 | $25,147 |
26 | James Robert Wilcox | Joplin, MO 64802 | $24,700 |
27 | James L Ratcliff | Vinita, OK 74301 | $24,579 |
28 | Bobbie Jean Weddle | Muldrow, OK 74948 | $24,504 |
29 | Arthur A Morgan Jr | Afton, OK 74331 | $22,957 |
30 | , | $22,508 | |
31 | Chad Ray Lucas | Wister, OK 74966 | $21,805 |
32 | Rusty Roberts | Valliant, OK 74764 | $21,267 |
33 | Benny W Hogan | Atoka, OK 74525 | $20,362 |
34 | Flint Garrett Morgan | Wright City, OK 74766 | $20,002 |
35 | John Long | Vinita, OK 74301 | $19,514 |
36 | Ronald Johnson | Baxter Springs, KS 66713 | $19,466 |
37 | Harvey Lee Arnold | Weatherford, TX 76087 | $18,547 |
38 | Martin Wayne Young | Wright City, OK 74766 | $18,523 |
39 | Damion Edward Howard | Wyandotte, OK 74370 | $18,400 |
40 | Randy Allen Frizzell | Clayton, OK 74536 | $18,236 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”