Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of Oklahoma
(Rep. Frank Lucas)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 14,200
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas) totaled $285,012,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Biron & Karee Shirley Jv | Alva, OK 73717 | $307,573 |
42 | Castle Farms LLC | Jet, OK 73749 | $305,959 |
43 | Mark Turner | Duke, OK 73532 | $305,089 |
44 | Kenny Lunsford | Guymon, OK 73942 | $302,453 |
45 | Virgil R Worth | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $298,452 |
46 | , | $290,236 | |
47 | Worrell Farms Partnership | Altus, OK 73521 | $287,940 |
48 | London Ranch LLC | Freedom, OK 73842 | $284,613 |
49 | Clinton Farms LLC | Altus, OK 73521 | $283,319 |
50 | Sdk Farms LLC | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $281,844 |
51 | K & S Partnership | Hollis, OK 73550 | $281,225 |
52 | Devin Brakhage | Boise City, OK 73933 | $280,541 |
53 | Pryor Farms Inc | Olustee, OK 73560 | $279,878 |
54 | Arthaud Farms Inc | Keyes, OK 73947 | $279,578 |
55 | Musick Farms | Sentinel, OK 73664 | $279,083 |
56 | Joel Eugene Imler | Boise City, OK 73933 | $278,374 |
57 | Minor Shad Imler | Boise City, OK 73933 | $276,315 |
58 | John Patrick Bourk | Boise City, OK 73933 | $275,330 |
59 | Long Family Farms Prtnrshp | Optima, OK 73945 | $271,767 |
60 | C A Lauer | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $269,007 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”