Cotton Ginning Program in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 902
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas) totaled $8,581,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mary Oren | Erick, OK 73645 | $35,656 |
62 | Tinney Land & Cattle Co | Altus, OK 73521 | $35,519 |
63 | Rann Williams 2001 Rev Tr | Altus, OK 73522 | $35,358 |
64 | Afl Farms LLC | Altus, OK 73522 | $35,147 |
65 | David Bailey | Hydro, OK 73048 | $34,741 |
66 | Ozark Farms Inc | Headrick, OK 73549 | $34,464 |
67 | Gossen G&b Rev Living Trust | Corn, OK 73024 | $34,260 |
68 | Collins Lee Miller | Eldorado, OK 73537 | $34,229 |
69 | C C Cunningham Farms, LLC | Hollis, OK 73550 | $34,194 |
70 | M R Williams & Sons Inc | Altus, OK 73521 | $33,960 |
71 | Brett Allen Porter | Hobart, OK 73651 | $33,317 |
72 | Ed & Rob Farms Inc | Altus, OK 73521 | $32,812 |
73 | Davis Joint Revocable Trust | Elk City, OK 73644 | $32,534 |
74 | Guy F Hudson Rev Living Trust | Altus, OK 73521 | $32,258 |
75 | Apache Industries Inc | Childress, TX 79201 | $32,000 |
76 | Clinton Farms LLC | Altus, OK 73521 | $31,581 |
77 | Drew Richard Darby | Duke, OK 73532 | $31,442 |
78 | R & S Farms Inc | Altus, OK 73521 | $31,422 |
79 | R & R Farms Inc | Altus, OK 73521 | $31,376 |
80 | Moreau Land And Cattle | Altus, OK 73521 | $30,974 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”