Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 8,982
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas) totaled $220,304,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Carol Johan Stewart | Keyes, OK 73947 | $206,669 |
102 | Charles Albert Mack | Waukomis, OK 73773 | $206,338 |
103 | Joe Lang | Enid, OK 73703 | $206,148 |
104 | J & J Farms | Forgan, OK 73938 | $206,098 |
105 | Donna Snider | Clinton, OK 73601 | $205,983 |
106 | Virgil R Worth | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $205,537 |
107 | B J Farms Inc | Keyes, OK 73947 | $203,993 |
108 | Metcalf Farms Partnership | Hooker, OK 73945 | $203,578 |
109 | Troy Don Skaggs | Nash, OK 73761 | $203,332 |
110 | M H Williams | Red Rock, OK 74651 | $203,030 |
111 | Edward A Mack Rev Trust Dated 8-8 | Enid, OK 73701 | $202,860 |
112 | Billy Ray Mizer | Boise City, OK 73933 | $202,306 |
113 | Rick K Spring | Waukomis, OK 73773 | $201,493 |
114 | Gary Dean Lingo | Meno, OK 73760 | $200,872 |
115 | Leroy Meier Trust | Garber, OK 73738 | $200,466 |
116 | Tom Thorp | Helena, OK 73741 | $200,347 |
117 | Virgil C Thorp | Helena, OK 73741 | $200,347 |
118 | Rudy Simic Trust | Garber, OK 73738 | $199,578 |
119 | William H Easterly | Enid, OK 73701 | $198,942 |
120 | Steven D Lippencott | Cheyenne, OK 73628 | $198,226 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”