Conservation Reserve Program in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 3,103
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas) totaled $15,910,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jerry L Webb | Goodwell, OK 73939 | $25,000 |
102 | , | $24,928 | |
103 | Thomas T James | Felt, OK 73937 | $24,854 |
104 | Janice Wilson Crews | Boise City, OK 73933 | $24,835 |
105 | Loyola Paulette Ellsworth | Boise City, OK 73933 | $24,719 |
106 | Emma Lou Hodges-dba Emma Lou Hodges Rev Liv Trust | Forgan, OK 73938 | $24,610 |
107 | Tyler M Kamp | Laverne, OK 73848 | $24,461 |
108 | , | $24,357 | |
109 | Fowler Family Farms LLC | Oklahoma City, OK 73127 | $24,312 |
110 | Stafford Family Ranch LLC | Weleetka, OK 74880 | $24,292 |
111 | Flanagan Land & Cattle Inc | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $24,223 |
112 | Julie Buck | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $24,221 |
113 | R G Grounds | Hooker, OK 73945 | $24,090 |
114 | John Howard Morris | Balko, OK 73931 | $24,004 |
115 | David Wayne Crawford | Boise City, OK 73933 | $23,912 |
116 | Underwood Farms Inc | Forgan, OK 73938 | $23,771 |
117 | Clyde Carlisle | Laverne, OK 73848 | $23,547 |
118 | Teresa Kay Davis | Garden City, KS 67846 | $23,511 |
119 | Brandon D Knowles | Arnett, OK 73832 | $23,490 |
120 | Dan E O'hair | Laverne, OK 73848 | $23,379 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”