Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 9,085
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas) totaled $148,240,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | D&g Cattle LLC | Morrison, OK 73061 | $115,767 |
122 | Alan Shields | Boise City, OK 73933 | $115,598 |
123 | Dean Kephart | Canute, OK 73626 | $115,141 |
124 | Dishman Land & Cattle LLC | Blair, OK 73526 | $114,831 |
125 | Michael S Stevens | Carmen, OK 73726 | $114,630 |
126 | Clark & Clark Farms Inc | Sayre, OK 73662 | $113,785 |
127 | Double L Livestock LLC | Isabella, OK 73747 | $113,415 |
128 | Lost Creek Ranch Performance Horses And Bucking Bu | Erick, OK 73645 | $113,405 |
129 | Rodney Meyer | Balko, OK 73931 | $113,059 |
130 | Hankey Farms LLC | Amorita, OK 73719 | $112,928 |
131 | Wolf Bros | Kingfisher, OK 73750 | $112,249 |
132 | Meacham Farms | Clinton, OK 73601 | $111,567 |
133 | Teddy R Miller | Arnett, OK 73832 | $111,504 |
134 | Price Farms LLC | Elk City, OK 73648 | $110,850 |
135 | Robert Paul Whorton | Gould, OK 73544 | $110,502 |
136 | Mark Denton | Dacoma, OK 73731 | $108,935 |
137 | Gary Williams | Red Rock, OK 74651 | $108,456 |
138 | B F Mccray Jr | Manchester, OK 73758 | $107,889 |
139 | Terry Lee Peach II | Chester, OK 73838 | $107,729 |
140 | R & L Halliburton LLC | Gage, OK 73843 | $107,621 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”