Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of Oklahoma
(Rep. Frank Lucas)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21,032
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas) totaled $270,199,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $3,596,516 |
| 2 | Farm Credit Of Western Oklahoma ** | Clinton, OK 73601 | $2,168,138 |
| 3 | Stockmans Bank ** | Gould, OK 73544 | $1,801,555 |
| 4 | Bank Of Kremlin | Kremlin, OK 73753 | $1,403,842 |
| 5 | Farm Credit Of Enid ** | Enid, OK 73703 | $1,066,529 |
| 6 | Ag Preference Credit Assn Pca ** | Altus, OK 73522 | $936,196 |
| 7 | Worrell Farms Partnership | Altus, OK 73521 | $828,015 |
| 8 | Mackey Livestock LLC | Alva, OK 73717 | $776,689 |
| 9 | Reinschmiedt Fam Gen Prtnrship | Garber, OK 73738 | $632,466 |
| 10 | Linda Robbins & Robert Robbins Jtvt | Altus, OK 73521 | $478,997 |
| 11 | Bates Bros & Sons | Altus, OK 73521 | $476,450 |
| 12 | Sv Farms Inc | Altus, OK 73521 | $435,556 |
| 13 | Jarod C & Jill L Abernathy Jt Vt | Altus, OK 73521 | $421,333 |
| 14 | First National Bank Of Oklahoma ** | Tonkawa, OK 74653 | $402,975 |
| 15 | First Bank & Trust ** | Perry, OK 73077 | $399,880 |
| 16 | Alva State Bank | Alva, OK 73717 | $394,745 |
| 17 | Tecolote Ranches LLC | Boise City, OK 73947 | $393,416 |
| 18 | Clint D & Kim K Abernathy Jt Vt | Altus, OK 73521 | $389,789 |
| 19 | Bancfirst ** | Frederick, OK 73542 | $370,658 |
| 20 | H & H Farms | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $349,439 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf