Production Flexibility Program in 4th District of Oklahoma (Rep. Tom Cole), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,453
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 4th District of Oklahoma (Rep. Tom Cole) totaled $49,144,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kyle Rex Shelton | Tulsa, OK 74105 | $123,624 |
62 | W Irvin Adams | Grandfield, OK 73546 | $123,546 |
63 | Donald R Baber | Randlett, OK 73562 | $122,743 |
64 | Danny Horschler | Temple, OK 73568 | $121,239 |
65 | Rick Beard | Devol, OK 73531 | $121,101 |
66 | Clint Gower | Temple, OK 73568 | $120,266 |
67 | Red River Farms | Terral, OK 73569 | $120,041 |
68 | James A Mckinnon | Denton, TX 76201 | $119,791 |
69 | Stephen Dilks | Randlett, OK 73562 | $118,961 |
70 | William Eugene Nunley | Marlow, OK 73055 | $118,186 |
71 | John M Fisher Etal | Marlow, OK 73055 | $118,124 |
72 | Sherrell David Griffith Estate | Newcastle, OK 73065 | $117,228 |
73 | Reeder Farms Inc | Marlow, OK 73055 | $115,712 |
74 | Edward Gunn | Walters, OK 73572 | $115,576 |
75 | Steven Baber | Devol, OK 73531 | $115,169 |
76 | John D Ross | Waurika, OK 73573 | $115,046 |
77 | Ely 1990 Joint Revocable Trust | Duncan, OK 73533 | $114,857 |
78 | Steve Harrison | Devol, OK 73531 | $113,964 |
79 | Charley E Beavers Jr | Duncan, OK 73533 | $112,154 |
80 | Kenneth Frieling | Devol, OK 73531 | $111,207 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”