Farm Subsidy information
4th District of Oklahoma
(Rep. Tom Cole)
Total Subsidies in 4th District of Oklahoma (Rep. Tom Cole), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,812
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 4th District of Oklahoma (Rep. Tom Cole) totaled $50,841,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Michael D Kelly | Marlow, OK 73055 | $107,437 |
82 | Todd Casebolt | Ryan, OK 73565 | $107,251 |
83 | Barrett & Sons | Ryan, OK 73565 | $104,599 |
84 | Clay John Carter | Waurika, OK 73573 | $104,189 |
85 | Hudspeth Cattle Company, LLC | Marietta, OK 73448 | $103,435 |
86 | John S Barnes | Elmore City, OK 73433 | $103,142 |
87 | 4 G Cattle Company | Ringling, OK 73456 | $103,048 |
88 | Jerry Joseph Johnson | Devol, OK 73531 | $103,043 |
89 | Bruce Humphries | Waurika, OK 73573 | $102,400 |
90 | Allen Wade | Ringling, OK 73456 | $101,681 |
91 | William E Dulaney Living Trust | Wynnewood, OK 73098 | $101,188 |
92 | Reece Farms LLC | Walters, OK 73572 | $100,948 |
93 | Jason Borders | Sulphur, OK 73086 | $100,314 |
94 | James Robert Rickey | Pauls Valley, OK 73075 | $99,686 |
95 | Pat Mcintyre Dba Mcintyre Farms Gp | Temple, OK 73568 | $99,224 |
96 | R A Smith Cattle Company LLC | Ryan, OK 73565 | $97,579 |
97 | Harold Lester | Ringling, OK 73456 | $97,072 |
98 | Rush Creek Farm Inc | Lindsay, OK 73052 | $96,610 |
99 | James H Young | Wynnewood, OK 73098 | $96,548 |
100 | Aaron Grooms | Maysville, OK 73057 | $96,474 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”