Counter Cyclical Program in 4th District of Oklahoma (Rep. Tom Cole), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,420

Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 4th District of Oklahoma (Rep. Tom Cole) totaled $11,005,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Counter Cyclical Program
1995-2023
101Tatum Living Trust Dated November 11, 2014Grandfield, OK 73546$24,686
102David Aaron PerryWashington, OK 73093$24,027
103E R ReeceNorman, OK 73072$24,013
104Kenneth Joe BurtonDevol, OK 73531$23,901
105Louise Gower Living TrustTemple, OK 73568$23,840
106John C GrahamMarlow, OK 73055$23,728
107Wood TrustDevol, OK 73531$23,721
108Norman PayneWayne, OK 73095$23,635
109Jerry D KingSan Antonio, TX 78259$23,467
110J Gregory EastmanWichita Falls, TX 76305$22,791
111Kyle W LewisHastings, OK 73548$22,622
112Lionel K BentleyWashington, OK 73093$22,456
113Jack Paul JonesByars, OK 74831$22,383
114Danny HorschlerTemple, OK 73568$22,348
115Walter Earl CoxTemple, OK 73568$21,791
116Roger W FisherRandlett, OK 73562$21,707
117Terry Allen GoodeGrandfield, OK 73546$21,673
118Kenneth Gerald ScottLawton, OK 73505$20,918
119Donald GillhamMaysville, OK 73057$20,697
120Harold MartinTerral, OK 73569$20,514

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag