Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Oregon
(Rep. Greg Walden)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,809
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden) totaled $99,216,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Oto Shorthorns | Canyon City, OR 97820 | $310,867 |
22 | D J Miller Ranch Inc | Frenchglen, OR 97736 | $297,754 |
23 | Rose's Livestock Company LLC | Christmas Valley, OR 97641 | $283,040 |
24 | Ron Burnette | Ritter, OR 97856 | $282,278 |
25 | Youngs Farm Blue Mountain Ranch LLC | Paulina, OR 97751 | $281,078 |
26 | Boyle Family Farms LLC | Madras, OR 97741 | $278,088 |
27 | Melvin Ambrose | Maupin, OR 97037 | $274,118 |
28 | Soldier Creek Cattle LLC | Burns, OR 97720 | $273,935 |
29 | Symons Livestock LLC | Madras, OR 97741 | $267,125 |
30 | Jenkins Ranches Inc | Diamond, OR 97722 | $263,233 |
31 | , | $261,593 | |
32 | Forman Ranch Inc | Antelope, OR 97001 | $257,769 |
33 | Krebs Sheep Company | Ione, OR 97843 | $251,587 |
34 | Jacob Joe Petersen | Culver, OR 97734 | $250,000 |
35 | Krebs Livestock LLC | Ione, OR 97843 | $249,630 |
36 | , | $243,230 | |
37 | Martin Underhill | Dufur, OR 97021 | $238,148 |
38 | Mike Peila | Hines, OR 97738 | $234,180 |
39 | Lcl Tyler Ranch LLC | Burns, OR 97720 | $228,158 |
40 | Zachary Hayes | Maupin, OR 97037 | $226,943 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”