Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,829
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden) totaled $28,976,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Stangel | Enterprise, OR 97828 | $94,965 |
22 | Stroh Farms LLC | Kent, OR 97033 | $94,744 |
23 | Alan W And Judy M Von Borstel | Grass Valley, OR 97029 | $94,666 |
24 | , | $91,662 | |
25 | Katherine E Filbin | Dufur, OR 97021 | $90,406 |
26 | Terry & Marilyn Eakin | Grass Valley, OR 97029 | $89,954 |
27 | Hardie Family General Partnership | Redmond, OR 97756 | $88,591 |
28 | , | $88,178 | |
29 | Circle R Ranch | Moro, OR 97039 | $87,675 |
30 | Summerfield Ag Enterprises | Heppner, OR 97836 | $87,158 |
31 | Nn Farming Company | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $86,177 |
32 | Strawfield Capital LLC | Prescott, WA 99348 | $85,330 |
33 | James H & Darlene L Nordquist | The Dalles, OR 97058 | $85,182 |
34 | B & B Ranches | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $83,982 |
35 | Rafter Zee Ranches | Ione, OR 97843 | $81,383 |
36 | Shirley L Decker | Kent, OR 97033 | $78,350 |
37 | Wooden Road Farms Inc | Prescott, WA 99348 | $76,205 |
38 | J S Burres And Sons | Condon, OR 97823 | $75,292 |
39 | Anderson Seed Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $74,060 |
40 | Shutler Ridge Farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $74,060 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”