Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Oregon
(Rep. Greg Walden)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,809
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden) totaled $99,216,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ctuir | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $226,357 |
42 | Dodge Land & Cattle Inc | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $226,351 |
43 | Ketscher Cattle Co | Hines, OR 97738 | $225,735 |
44 | Broken Circle Company | Hines, OR 97738 | $224,971 |
45 | Thompson Ranch Inc | Burns, OR 97720 | $224,734 |
46 | Kiely Brothers Ranch | Adel, OR 97620 | $222,004 |
47 | Cahill Ranches Inc | Adel, OR 97620 | $220,823 |
48 | Hartley Farms & Feedlot LLC | Nyssa, OR 97913 | $218,297 |
49 | Cooper Family Orchards LLC | The Dalles, OR 97058 | $213,946 |
50 | Kurt M. Spencer | Roseburg, OR 97471 | $208,812 |
51 | Southworth Bros Inc | Seneca, OR 97873 | $208,437 |
52 | , | $207,543 | |
53 | Tracy Ranch LLC | Lakeview, OR 97630 | $203,702 |
54 | Starlight Cattle Company, Inc. | Drewsey, OR 97904 | $202,202 |
55 | Jack Flynn Cattle Co | Plush, OR 97637 | $201,691 |
56 | Eastern Oregon Investment Management | La Grande, OR 97850 | $200,000 |
57 | Hotchkiss Company | Burns, OR 97720 | $199,703 |
58 | Bert R Siddoway | Durkee, OR 97905 | $198,578 |
59 | Mccormack Ranch LLC | Prineville, OR 97754 | $198,155 |
60 | O'leary Ranch Inc | Paisley, OR 97636 | $197,527 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”