Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,894
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden) totaled $28,837,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Charles W Stangel Trust | Reno, NV 89521 | $69,344 |
42 | Potter & Son's Farms | Condon, OR 97823 | $68,524 |
43 | L & T Weidert Farms | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $67,388 |
44 | Midway Ranches | Heppner, OR 97836 | $65,372 |
45 | Brown Farm | Heppner, OR 97836 | $63,840 |
46 | Aspen Partnership | Durkee, OR 97905 | $63,181 |
47 | Carlson Brothers | Kent, OR 97033 | $61,868 |
48 | Jeff & Cindy Shaw Ranch | Pilot Rock, OR 97868 | $61,866 |
49 | Haguewood Ranch | Heppner, OR 97836 | $61,610 |
50 | Tim & Sara Morelli | Maupin, OR 97037 | $60,734 |
51 | M & T Thorne | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $60,710 |
52 | Joan Weinke | Pilot Rock, OR 97868 | $59,814 |
53 | Frances Mae Dalzell Testamentary | Condon, OR 97823 | $59,736 |
54 | Doug & Carley Drake Ranch | Heppner, OR 97836 | $57,926 |
55 | Anderson Seed Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $57,386 |
56 | Shutler Ridge Farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $57,386 |
57 | Katherine E Filbin | Dufur, OR 97021 | $56,598 |
58 | Munkers Farms | Lexington, OR 97839 | $56,382 |
59 | Bell Ranch Partnership | Heppner, OR 97836 | $55,107 |
60 | Starr Family Ranch, LLC | Centerville, WA 98613 | $54,782 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”