Loan Deficiency in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 4,401
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden) totaled $55,529,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Hill Ranches Inc | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $111,333 |
62 | Don A Woodward Farms Inc | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $110,416 |
63 | Peters Ranches | Wasco, OR 97065 | $110,059 |
64 | Johns Ranch Inc | Athena, OR 97813 | $109,766 |
65 | J & G Farm | Lyle, WA 98635 | $109,475 |
66 | Srm Partnership | Bakersfield, CA 93309 | $107,938 |
67 | Blatchford Brothers | Baker City, OR 97814 | $107,867 |
68 | Jay & Cynthia Tucker Partnership | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $107,845 |
69 | Miller Wheat & Cattle Ltd | Dufur, OR 97021 | $107,823 |
70 | Daniel L Carver | Maupin, OR 97037 | $106,329 |
71 | P J Rohde Ranch Inc | Echo, OR 97826 | $106,024 |
72 | Terra Magic Inc | La Grande, OR 97850 | $104,822 |
73 | Holdman Ranches Inc | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $103,951 |
74 | Ernest J Barnett | The Dalles, OR 97058 | $103,949 |
75 | Adams Supply Company | Adams, OR 97810 | $103,803 |
76 | Weimar Ranch | The Dalles, OR 97058 | $101,712 |
77 | Lieuallen Farms | Adams, OR 97810 | $100,970 |
78 | Trico Farms | La Grande, OR 97850 | $100,121 |
79 | B & B Ranches | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $99,866 |
80 | Deboer Farms | Nyssa, OR 97913 | $98,608 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”