Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,600
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden) totaled $28,520,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Double Oarlock LLC | Adel, OR 97620 | $71,990 |
82 | Kenneth Brooks | Fox, OR 97856 | $70,384 |
83 | Hammond Ranches Inc | Diamond, OR 97722 | $70,198 |
84 | Thompson Land | Heppner, OR 97836 | $70,155 |
85 | Ross Defenbaugh | Fields, OR 97710 | $70,148 |
86 | 70 Ranch Inc | Lakeview, OR 97630 | $69,606 |
87 | Davis Ranches And Farms Inc. | Princeton, OR 97721 | $69,577 |
88 | Phillips Ranch Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $69,495 |
89 | Phillips Cattle Co | Baker City, OR 97814 | $69,208 |
90 | Carver Livestock LLC | Maupin, OR 97037 | $68,865 |
91 | Mary M Wilson Dba Mann Lake Ranch | Princeton, OR 97721 | $68,733 |
92 | Buck Creek Ranches LLC | Riley, OR 97758 | $68,261 |
93 | Snow-mcelligott | Ione, OR 97843 | $68,114 |
94 | , | $67,934 | |
95 | , | $67,804 | |
96 | Terry Warn | Jordan Valley, OR 97910 | $67,581 |
97 | Tobin L Mcbride | Jamieson, OR 97909 | $67,527 |
98 | William P Conley | Prineville, OR 97754 | $67,161 |
99 | Will Bentz | Burns, OR 97720 | $66,771 |
100 | Laird Ranch LLC | Plush, OR 97637 | $66,427 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”