Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,618
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden) totaled $74,949,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Deseret Farms Inc | Nyssa, OR 97913 | $264,011 |
22 | Bracher Farms | Helix, OR 97835 | $255,885 |
23 | Starvation Farms | Lexington, OR 97839 | $250,435 |
24 | Ctuir | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $249,934 |
25 | Kesler Farms Inc | Nyssa, OR 97913 | $248,192 |
26 | Kitamura Farms Inc | Ontario, OR 97914 | $247,625 |
27 | Bates Ranches | Condon, OR 97823 | $243,870 |
28 | Bohlender Colorado Farms LLC | Fruitland, ID 83619 | $242,625 |
29 | Nolin Farming Company | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $237,153 |
30 | Hill Leasing LLC | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $232,160 |
31 | Spring Hollow Farming | Athena, OR 97813 | $228,486 |
32 | Curtis J Troyer | Cove, OR 97824 | $228,219 |
33 | Dallas Ranch Partnership | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $225,334 |
34 | Diamond X Ranch LLC | Athena, OR 97813 | $225,067 |
35 | Brd Farming | Adams, OR 97810 | $224,997 |
36 | Pigeon Butte Joint Venture | Arlington, OR 97812 | $224,226 |
37 | B L Davis Ranch Inc | Adams, OR 97810 | $223,534 |
38 | Jdo Enterprises | Pilot Rock, OR 97868 | $216,406 |
39 | Blatchford Farms Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $214,045 |
40 | Madras Farms Co | Madras, OR 97741 | $209,244 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”