Farm Subsidy information
4th District of Oregon
(Rep. Peter DeFazio)
Total Subsidies in 4th District of Oregon (Rep. Peter DeFazio), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 494
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 4th District of Oregon (Rep. Peter DeFazio) totaled $6,171,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Elaine M Rone | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $20,068 |
62 | Ferguson & Son Cattle Co | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $19,436 |
63 | Gilbreath Family Trust | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $19,185 |
64 | Alexis R Leatherwood | Oakland, OR 97462 | $18,179 |
65 | Bkp Livestock LLC | Roseburg, OR 97471 | $18,124 |
66 | , | $17,870 | |
67 | Kennerly Ranches LLC | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $17,814 |
68 | Hernandez-mckenzie Livestock LLC | Langlois, OR 97450 | $17,620 |
69 | Veril L Nelson | Oakland, OR 97462 | $16,960 |
70 | Kesterson Brothers Logging Company Inc | Elkton, OR 97436 | $16,861 |
71 | Hawley Land & Cattle LLC | Cottage Grove, OR 97424 | $16,614 |
72 | Jeremy Pynch | Sutherlin, OR 97479 | $16,475 |
73 | , | $16,446 | |
74 | Thomas E Tipton | Umpqua, OR 97486 | $16,392 |
75 | Bonnie J Harless | Broadbent, OR 97414 | $16,339 |
76 | Rex Fuller | Days Creek, OR 97429 | $16,194 |
77 | Darryl C Ray | Oakland, OR 97462 | $16,186 |
78 | Doug Singleton | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $16,036 |
79 | James Langdon | Oakland, OR 97462 | $15,805 |
80 | Cindy Sigfridson | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $15,744 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”