Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 4th District of Oregon (Rep. Peter DeFazio), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 322
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 4th District of Oregon (Rep. Peter DeFazio) totaled $3,556,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Veril L Nelson | Oakland, OR 97462 | $9,014 |
102 | Jackson Living Trust | Yoncalla, OR 97499 | $9,011 |
103 | Todd James Little | Myrtle Point, OR 97458 | $8,793 |
104 | Bette Ray | Myrtle Point, OR 97458 | $8,656 |
105 | Brad Edmund Baimbridge | Sutherlin, OR 97479 | $8,630 |
106 | Clover Hills Ranch LLC | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $8,490 |
107 | Jesus M Hernandez | Langlois, OR 97450 | $8,334 |
108 | Raymond T Petrie | Myrtle Point, OR 97458 | $8,137 |
109 | Ethan A Banducci | Umpqua, OR 97486 | $8,086 |
110 | Elizabeth L Potter | Langlois, OR 97450 | $8,061 |
111 | David K Rolfe | Coquille, OR 97423 | $7,982 |
112 | Katherine E Little | Myrtle Point, OR 97458 | $7,974 |
113 | Mitchell W Vincent | Bandon, OR 97411 | $7,955 |
114 | Dale Blanton | Powers, OR 97466 | $7,863 |
115 | Lester R Ocumpaugh | Oakland, OR 97462 | $7,850 |
116 | Trent Andrew Peter Pynch | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $7,725 |
117 | Jan M Geaney | Coquille, OR 97423 | $7,675 |
118 | Timothy S Murphy | Sutherlin, OR 97479 | $7,570 |
119 | Lori Ann Humbert | Myrtle Creek, OR 97457 | $7,560 |
120 | Gary E Dye | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $7,392 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”