Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Rhode Island
(Rep. David Cicilline)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Rhode Island (Rep. David Cicilline), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 30
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Rhode Island (Rep. David Cicilline) totaled $283,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Peter W Brown | Bristol, RI 02809 | $99,272 |
2 | Sweet Berry Farm | Middletown, RI 02842 | $28,460 |
3 | , | $27,875 | |
4 | Louis Escobar | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $24,870 |
5 | Silas Peckham-paul | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $19,640 |
6 | Wishing Stone Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $16,699 |
7 | , | $12,275 | |
8 | Society For The Preservation Of | Boston, MA 02114 | $10,034 |
9 | Newport Vineyards & Winery LLC | Middletown, RI 02842 | $4,874 |
10 | Escobar Farm LLC | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $4,802 |
11 | New England Grass-fed LLC | Hope Valley, RI 02832 | $4,519 |
12 | Greenvale Vineyards Ltd | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $4,277 |
13 | , | $3,357 | |
14 | Brian Simmons | Middletown, RI 02842 | $3,264 |
15 | Cabot Family LLC Dba White Rock Farm | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $2,945 |
16 | E George Neale | Jamestown, RI 02835 | $2,633 |
17 | Shirley Tribou | Fairhaven, MA 02719 | $2,452 |
18 | John P Sousa | Warren, RI 02885 | $2,052 |
19 | Liying Peng | Barrington, RI 02806 | $1,613 |
20 | Byron S Kee | Warren, RI 02885 | $1,513 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>