Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Rhode Island (Rep. David Cicilline), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 66
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Rhode Island (Rep. David Cicilline) totaled $1,359,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Movement Ground Farm | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $3,586 |
42 | Byron S Kee | Warren, RI 02885 | $3,329 |
43 | Middle Acres Cranberry | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $3,203 |
44 | The Martha S Neale Trust | Jamestown, RI 02835 | $3,148 |
45 | Russell Helger | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $2,716 |
46 | New England Grass-fed LLC | Hope Valley, RI 02832 | $2,365 |
47 | , | $2,344 | |
48 | Stephen M Anderson | Jamestown, RI 02835 | $2,029 |
49 | Cluck And Trowel | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $1,959 |
50 | Alexandra Bonome | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $1,838 |
51 | Shirley Tribou | Fairhaven, MA 02719 | $1,708 |
52 | Golden Nugget Oysters LLC | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $1,572 |
53 | Paul E Brule | Warren, RI 02885 | $1,430 |
54 | Spencer Morris | Warren, RI 02885 | $1,386 |
55 | Cabot Family LLC Dba White Rock Farm | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $1,075 |
56 | Liying Peng | Barrington, RI 02806 | $887 |
57 | Robert Carr | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $825 |
58 | Silas Peckham-paul | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $706 |
59 | Matthew Dutra | Middletown, RI 02842 | $648 |
60 | , | $542 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”