Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Rhode Island
(Rep. David Cicilline)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Rhode Island (Rep. David Cicilline), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 221
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Rhode Island (Rep. David Cicilline) totaled $4,862,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Pond View Gardens LLC | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $28,510 |
| 42 | David Iglesias | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $27,634 |
| 43 | Mark Goerner | Jamestown, RI 02835 | $25,486 |
| 44 | Cockeast Fisheries Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $25,242 |
| 45 | Rhode Island Department Of Enviro | Prudence Island, RI 02872 | $25,000 |
| 46 | Cj's Pondview Farm LLC | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $24,416 |
| 47 | Francis Nunes | Middletown, RI 02842 | $23,948 |
| 48 | Two Brothers Fisheries Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $23,570 |
| 49 | Greenvale Vineyards Ltd | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $22,885 |
| 50 | Alison Rose Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $22,684 |
| 51 | David M Cotta | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $22,075 |
| 52 | Grey Dog Fisheries | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $21,508 |
| 53 | Silas Peckham-paul | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $21,383 |
| 54 | Lucien Lebreux | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $21,031 |
| 55 | E George Neale | Jamestown, RI 02835 | $20,822 |
| 56 | Manuel J Silvia | Middletown, RI 02842 | $20,691 |
| 57 | Skinny Dip Farm | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $20,596 |
| 58 | Terminator Fisheries Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $20,525 |
| 59 | Roots Farm | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $19,677 |
| 60 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $19,135 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf