Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Rhode Island (Rep. David Cicilline), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 178

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Rhode Island (Rep. David Cicilline) totaled $3,035,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
1Escobar Farm LLCPortsmouth, RI 02871$263,056
2Palombo Fishing CorpNewport, RI 02840$247,879
3The Rhode Island Nurseries IncMiddletown, RI 02842$222,831
4Hoogendoorn Nurseries IncMiddletown, RI 02842$182,802
5Louis EscobarPortsmouth, RI 02871$114,368
6Decastro Farms IncPortsmouth, RI 02871$101,078
7Portsmouth Nursery Inc.Portsmouth, RI 02871$99,305
8John F BettencourtTiverton, RI 02878$84,104
9Salt Water Farms LLCNorth Kingstown, RI 02852$77,054
10Joseph F DutraJamestown, RI 02835$74,406
11Young Family FarmLittle Compton, RI 02837$71,100
12Ferolbink Farms IncTiverton, RI 02878$67,172
13Mello's Farm & Flower CenterPortsmouth, RI 02871$62,898
14Spencer Fish And LobsterJamestown, RI 02835$59,040
15Wishing Stone IncLittle Compton, RI 02837$57,811
16Mataronas Lobster Co IncLittle Compton, RI 02837$53,618
17Highview Farm LLCTiverton, RI 02878$38,833
18Sutton EnterprisesNewport, RI 02840$36,549
19Cotta Farm, LLCPortsmouth, RI 02871$35,015
20Sweet Berry FarmMiddletown, RI 02842$34,563

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag