Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 329
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin) totaled $8,968,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Robert W Krause | Charlestown, RI 02813 | $12,077 |
122 | Second Wind Fisheries Inc | North Kingstown, RI 02852 | $11,969 |
123 | William Callaway | Wanchese, NC 27981 | $11,860 |
124 | Rocky Rhode Oyster Co, LLC | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $11,487 |
125 | Anthony Ponte | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $11,355 |
126 | Rhode Island Oyster Seed, LLC | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $11,081 |
127 | Red Tail Fisheries Inc | West Kingston, RI 02892 | $10,729 |
128 | Benjamin Coerper | Exeter, RI 02822 | $10,617 |
129 | Matthew Ryan Griffin | North Kingstown, RI 02852 | $10,403 |
130 | Js Fisheries Inc. | Ashaway, RI 02804 | $10,324 |
131 | Rebecca Mary Inc | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $10,047 |
132 | Perra Farm | Coventry, RI 02816 | $10,040 |
133 | Lanny Dellinger Jr | Saunderstown, RI 02874 | $9,938 |
134 | Quonnie Farms LLC | Charlestown, RI 02813 | $9,898 |
135 | Mooresfield Oyster Farm LLC | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $9,874 |
136 | Richard Lodge | Charlestown, RI 02813 | $9,381 |
137 | Ruth James | Bradford, RI 02808 | $9,319 |
138 | Luckyfoot Ranch Partnership | Charlestown, RI 02813 | $9,279 |
139 | Ocean State Fisheries Inc | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $8,915 |
140 | Palmer Farm | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $8,910 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”