Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 329

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin) totaled $8,968,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
121Robert W KrauseCharlestown, RI 02813$12,077
122Second Wind Fisheries IncNorth Kingstown, RI 02852$11,969
123William CallawayWanchese, NC 27981$11,860
124Rocky Rhode Oyster Co, LLCWakefield, RI 02879$11,487
125Anthony PonteWakefield, RI 02879$11,355
126Rhode Island Oyster Seed, LLCWakefield, RI 02879$11,081
127Red Tail Fisheries IncWest Kingston, RI 02892$10,729
128Benjamin CoerperExeter, RI 02822$10,617
129Matthew Ryan GriffinNorth Kingstown, RI 02852$10,403
130Js Fisheries Inc.Ashaway, RI 02804$10,324
131Rebecca Mary IncWakefield, RI 02879$10,047
132Perra FarmCoventry, RI 02816$10,040
133Lanny Dellinger JrSaunderstown, RI 02874$9,938
134Quonnie Farms LLCCharlestown, RI 02813$9,898
135Mooresfield Oyster Farm LLCNarragansett, RI 02882$9,874
136Richard LodgeCharlestown, RI 02813$9,381
137Ruth JamesBradford, RI 02808$9,319
138Luckyfoot Ranch PartnershipCharlestown, RI 02813$9,279
139Ocean State Fisheries IncNarragansett, RI 02882$8,915
140Palmer FarmNorth Stonington, CT 06359$8,910

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag