Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Rhode Island
(Rep. James Langevin)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 66
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin) totaled $2,057,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kingston Turf Farms Inc | West Kingston, RI 02892 | $313,920 |
| 2 | Sodco Inc | Slocum, RI 02877 | $285,764 |
| 3 | Turf Inc | Slocum, RI 02877 | $243,447 |
| 4 | Determination Fisheries LLC | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $184,792 |
| 5 | Washington County Turf Inc | West Kingston, RI 02892 | $155,812 |
| 6 | Lightning Bay Inc | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $151,918 |
| 7 | Laurel Brook Turf Inc | West Kingston, RI 02892 | $79,033 |
| 8 | Edwin Laprise | Exeter, RI 02822 | $73,170 |
| 9 | A Turf Farm Inc | Hope Valley, RI 02832 | $70,388 |
| 10 | Tartan Farms LLC | West Kingston, RI 02892 | $52,410 |
| 11 | Tenacity Fisheries LLC | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $50,087 |
| 12 | Jeffrey Farrell | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $47,220 |
| 13 | Elmridge Fisheries Inc | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $33,493 |
| 14 | Bella Sky LLC | Hampton, VA 23669 | $32,783 |
| 15 | Dudley Fisheries LLC | Charlestown, RI 02813 | $32,505 |
| 16 | Trina Marsh | Ashaway, RI 02804 | $21,003 |
| 17 | Melissa Jordan | Sterling, CT 06377 | $16,996 |
| 18 | Vincent P Confreda | Warwick, RI 02888 | $16,550 |
| 19 | Tj Landscape Design And Construction Inc | Bradford, RI 02808 | $15,937 |
| 20 | John P Leyden | West Greenwich, RI 02817 | $15,364 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf