Farm Subsidy information
5th District of South Carolina
(Rep. Ralph Norman)
Total Subsidies in 5th District of South Carolina (Rep. Ralph Norman), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 145
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 5th District of South Carolina (Rep. Ralph Norman) totaled $1,142,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gary A Watson | Chester, SC 29706 | $11,905 |
22 | Hugh J Harshaw III | Mc Connells, SC 29726 | $11,829 |
23 | Joe Houston | Chester, SC 29706 | $11,195 |
24 | Rusty Ramsey | Sharon, SC 29742 | $9,989 |
25 | David J Wilson | Edgemoor, SC 29712 | $9,595 |
26 | Strait Farm LLC | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $9,375 |
27 | Rocky Ridge Farm Inc Of Sc | Sharon, SC 29742 | $9,239 |
28 | Justin Mayhugh | Chester, SC 29706 | $9,137 |
29 | Tommy Bratton | Hickory Grove, SC 29717 | $9,061 |
30 | Richard G Evans Jr | Chester, SC 29706 | $8,672 |
31 | Donald Steve Mobley Jr | Chester, SC 29706 | $8,098 |
32 | West C Stevenson III | Chester, SC 29706 | $8,088 |
33 | Lewis W Hicks | York, SC 29745 | $7,741 |
34 | Charles Mcduffie Steele Jr | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $7,723 |
35 | Melvin Jackson Propst | Clover, SC 29710 | $7,715 |
36 | John C Petty | Blacksburg, SC 29702 | $7,621 |
37 | T Wesley Carter | Chester, SC 29706 | $7,567 |
38 | William Thomas Sherer Iv | Hickory Grove, SC 29717 | $7,548 |
39 | Glenda C Allen | Catawba, SC 29704 | $7,477 |
40 | John R Williams III | Chester, SC 29706 | $7,434 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”