Direct Payment Program in 5th District of South Carolina (Rep. Ralph Norman), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 404
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 5th District of South Carolina (Rep. Ralph Norman) totaled $3,550,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Robert W Gordon | York, SC 29745 | $12,237 |
42 | Martha H Sudol | Chester, SC 29706 | $12,229 |
43 | H Clinton Boyd Jr | York, SC 29745 | $11,397 |
44 | Robert H Clawson | Mc Connells, SC 29726 | $11,074 |
45 | Clifton Earl Thrailkill Jr | Fort Lawn, SC 29714 | $11,018 |
46 | James L Ligon Jr | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $10,953 |
47 | Walter Neal | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $9,431 |
48 | Mica A Chappell | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $8,905 |
49 | John M Aycock Jr | Rock Hill, SC 29732 | $8,830 |
50 | Ernest T Whitesell Jr | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $8,390 |
51 | W L Abernathy III | Chester, SC 29706 | $8,154 |
52 | William P Carpenter III | Chester, SC 29706 | $8,099 |
53 | Pamela Ellis | York, SC 29745 | $8,082 |
54 | White Oak Farms Inc | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $8,024 |
55 | A Eugene Faulk | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $8,006 |
56 | Clarence W Senn Jr | York, SC 29745 | $7,973 |
57 | Jean E Weaver | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $7,954 |
58 | Donna H White | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $7,862 |
59 | John Beglin | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $7,463 |
60 | Chappell Heritage Farm LLC | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $7,406 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”