Farm Subsidy information
5th District of South Carolina
(Rep. Ralph Norman)
Total Subsidies in 5th District of South Carolina (Rep. Ralph Norman), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 211
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 5th District of South Carolina (Rep. Ralph Norman) totaled $1,939,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Boyd Farms | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $539,376 |
2 | Strait Farm LLC | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $163,435 |
3 | F Guy Darby Jr | Chester, SC 29706 | $122,975 |
4 | Joey Wilson | Chester, SC 29706 | $98,241 |
5 | Ronald H Stephenson | Chester, SC 29706 | $93,925 |
6 | Hugh J Harshaw III | Mc Connells, SC 29726 | $76,527 |
7 | Cotton Hills Farm LLC | Chester, SC 29706 | $69,337 |
8 | H J Millen Jr | Chester, SC 29706 | $67,156 |
9 | Carolina Cotton LLC | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $58,335 |
10 | Joe S Gaston Jr | Richburg, SC 29729 | $48,015 |
11 | Reed Rogers | Chester, SC 29706 | $44,927 |
12 | James W Crowder Iv | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $42,034 |
13 | Richard M Roach | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $28,983 |
14 | William E Johnston Jr | Rock Hill, SC 29732 | $28,843 |
15 | Wm O Covington | Mc Connells, SC 29726 | $26,490 |
16 | William H Nance | Mc Connells, SC 29726 | $24,225 |
17 | Kemp Summerfield Wilson | Chester, SC 29706 | $22,137 |
18 | Arthur Q Black | York, SC 29745 | $18,639 |
19 | P William Aycock Jr | Gastonia, NC 28054 | $18,539 |
20 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $17,033 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>