Direct Payment Program in 5th District of South Carolina (Rep. Ralph Norman), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 404
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 5th District of South Carolina (Rep. Ralph Norman) totaled $3,550,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | P William Aycock Jr | Gastonia, NC 28054 | $25,760 |
22 | Hugh J Harshaw III | Mc Connells, SC 29726 | $25,629 |
23 | D & G Farms | York, SC 29745 | $24,556 |
24 | Arthur Q Black | York, SC 29745 | $24,131 |
25 | Nazareth Baptist Church | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $21,387 |
26 | A G Westbrook III | Catawba, SC 29704 | $20,758 |
27 | Frank Z Mattox | Hickory Grove, SC 29717 | $20,328 |
28 | W. Chris Adkins | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $19,863 |
29 | James D Watson | Chester, SC 29706 | $19,622 |
30 | Warren J Chappell Estate | Rock Hill, SC 29732 | $17,931 |
31 | William H Nance | Mc Connells, SC 29726 | $17,882 |
32 | Joe W Hope | York, SC 29745 | $17,724 |
33 | Carlos Sanchez | Lancaster, SC 29721 | $17,073 |
34 | Cloverdale Farms LLC | Clover, SC 29710 | $16,660 |
35 | Ann S Mcnerney | Chester, SC 29706 | $15,523 |
36 | Robert A Fewell | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $15,187 |
37 | Mcgill Family Partnership Ltd | Charlotte, NC 28217 | $13,827 |
38 | F Ragin Craig | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $13,545 |
39 | Joyce M Hayes | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $13,337 |
40 | Gibson Limited Partnership Of Sou | Richburg, SC 29729 | $12,757 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”