Farm Subsidy information
6th District of South Carolina
(Rep. James Clyburn)
Total Subsidies in 6th District of South Carolina (Rep. James Clyburn), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 114
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 6th District of South Carolina (Rep. James Clyburn) totaled $1,735,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Robert E Crosby | Estill, SC 29918 | $349,710 |
2 | Nimmer Turf And Tree Farm Inc | Ridgeland, SC 29936 | $100,000 |
3 | Crapse Farms | Estill, SC 29918 | $94,526 |
4 | Griner Farms | Varnville, SC 29944 | $87,742 |
5 | Bobby Lee Crosby | Estill, SC 29918 | $77,890 |
6 | Corrin F Bowers And Son | Luray, SC 29932 | $75,638 |
7 | Rouse Farms | Luray, SC 29932 | $56,321 |
8 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $52,276 |
9 | Deloach Farms LLC | Varnville, SC 29944 | $45,813 |
10 | Mcarthur Williams | Fairfax, SC 29827 | $44,390 |
11 | Tony E Jarrell | Brunson, SC 29911 | $42,018 |
12 | Anthony Russell | Estill, SC 29918 | $41,724 |
13 | , | $38,470 | |
14 | Douglas L Jarrell | Estill, SC 29918 | $34,697 |
15 | Kevin E Jarrell | Hampton, SC 29924 | $32,078 |
16 | , | $31,843 | |
17 | Mt Carmel LLC | Estill, SC 29918 | $28,727 |
18 | Gray Farms LLC | Estill, SC 29918 | $24,782 |
19 | , | $23,432 | |
20 | , | $22,705 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>