Conservation Reserve Program in 6th District of South Carolina (Rep. James Clyburn), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 220

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 6th District of South Carolina (Rep. James Clyburn) totaled $2,942,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
101Chassereau Brothers VentureHampton, SC 29924$6,660
102Williamn Mcleod RhodesCharleston, SC 29414$6,609
103Jennifer R GilliamHampton, SC 29924$6,567
104Chrystal R BrunsonHampton, SC 29924$6,567
105Harry W All IIBluffton, SC 29910$6,407
106Catherine G PhillipsLilburn, GA 30047$6,302
107J O Patterson Sr EstateGarnett, SC 29922$6,300
108Mole FarmsBrunson, SC 29911$6,284
109Robert H GiffordEstill, SC 29918$6,228
110Martha LongVarnville, SC 29944$6,120
111Elizabeth R ReelSpartanburg, SC 29302$6,077
112Adeline R StehleJonesville, SC 29353$6,077
113S C Dept Of Natural ResourcesColumbia, SC 29202$5,868
114John R Crapse JrEstill, SC 29918$5,500
115Sam KielweinBeaufort, SC 29906$5,240
116Calvin Warren Sr Rvoc TrustHampton, SC 29924$5,203
117Jack H ThomasWest Columbia, SC 29170$4,984
118Maryann Eubanks CrewsColumbia, SC 29205$4,974
119Annie D ShumanGarnett, SC 29922$4,848
120Leigh Stehle SmithClinton, SC 29325$4,752

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag