Total Conservation Programs in 6th District of South Carolina (Rep. James Clyburn), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 289

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 6th District of South Carolina (Rep. James Clyburn) totaled $3,359,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
101Wesley MurdaughHilton Head Island, SC 29926$7,501
102Barker AssociatesBeaufort, SC 29902$7,350
103Juanita YoumansHampton, SC 29924$7,256
104Clarence McmillanBrunson, SC 29911$7,120
105Roger M Bostick JrEstill, SC 29918$7,053
106W T Robertson JrIndianola, MS 38751$7,053
107Harper & Associates Land CoLexington, SC 29072$7,035
108Alexander B Robertson SrIndianola, MS 38751$7,017
109Scotia FarmEstill, SC 29918$6,849
110Scotia Farms LpAllendale, SC 29810$6,849
111P24 Sc Dept Of Natural ResourcesColumbia, SC 29202$6,759
112Rebecca R ElliottEstill, SC 29918$6,752
113Mary Y WilliamsHartsville, SC 29550$6,723
114Jerry M Cone SrFairfax, SC 29827$6,690
115William J WeekleyChicago, IL 60610$6,677
116Chassereau Brothers VentureHampton, SC 29924$6,660
117Williamn Mcleod RhodesCharleston, SC 29414$6,609
118Jennifer R GilliamHampton, SC 29924$6,567
119Chrystal R BrunsonHampton, SC 29924$6,567
120Harry W All IIBluffton, SC 29910$6,407

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag