Farm Subsidy information
6th District of South Carolina
(Rep. James Clyburn)
Total Subsidies in 6th District of South Carolina (Rep. James Clyburn), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,052
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 6th District of South Carolina (Rep. James Clyburn) totaled $80,290,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Jarrell Brothers Farms | Estill, SC 29918 | $76,301 |
122 | Wise H Batten | Estill, SC 29918 | $76,154 |
123 | Wilson P Tuten Jr | Hampton, SC 29924 | $75,976 |
124 | Francis E Lightsey | Estill, SC 29918 | $74,919 |
125 | Anthony Russell | Estill, SC 29918 | $73,736 |
126 | Margaret S Goettee | Atlanta, GA 30327 | $73,341 |
127 | Ac Breland Farms LLC | Estill, SC 29918 | $71,024 |
128 | Catherine A Peeples Beale | San Mateo, FL 32187 | $70,890 |
129 | Howard Priester | Fairfax, SC 29827 | $70,826 |
130 | Ralph C Causey Jr | Furman, SC 29921 | $70,328 |
131 | Sue L Viola | Varnville, SC 29944 | $70,228 |
132 | Eddie A Peeples | Green Cove Springs, FL 32043 | $69,786 |
133 | Clarence R Peeples Jr | San Mateo, FL 32187 | $69,786 |
134 | Tony E Jarrell | Brunson, SC 29911 | $69,683 |
135 | Stiles M Harper Jr | Estill, SC 29918 | $68,761 |
136 | C Alan Runyan | Hampton, SC 29924 | $66,904 |
137 | Angus Brown Farms LLC | Hampton, SC 29924 | $63,889 |
138 | Russell Mixon | Hampton, SC 29924 | $62,386 |
139 | W Ted & Jerry M Cone | Sycamore, SC 29846 | $61,931 |
140 | Bowers Plantation LLC | Columbia, SC 29204 | $60,584 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”