Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 407

Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $14,575,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Market Facilitation Program (MFP)
1995-2023
21Floyd Johnson JrLatta, SC 29565$125,615
22Duff M WilliamsNichols, SC 29581$123,950
23Michael G GibsonMarion, SC 29571$123,714
24Michael And Tony Poston PartnersMullins, SC 29574$123,287
25The Promise Land Stillwell FarmsMc Coll, SC 29570$122,975
26Daniel Joyner NanceLake View, SC 29563$117,710
27Kayson T StricklandNichols, SC 29581$116,008
28Douglas H & Margaret H NewtonClio, SC 29525$107,496
29David Boyd OwensMullins, SC 29574$103,750
30John Mcinnis Farms IncClio, SC 29525$103,661
31E Duncan AyersBennettsville, SC 29512$103,574
32Baxley & Baxley FarmsDillon, SC 29536$101,904
33M Russell WiseAynor, SC 29511$101,476
34Robert Smith JrDillon, SC 29536$100,569
35D L Coleman & Son FarmsDillon, SC 29536$98,880
36Hammond Farm 2Nichols, SC 29581$97,816
37Martin & Sons Farms LLCGalivants Ferry, SC 29544$97,566
38Donald Jeffrey QuickBennettsville, SC 29512$96,759
39Little Pee Dee FarmsDillon, SC 29536$95,295
40Marlboro Tobacco Farms LLCBennettsville, SC 29512$90,317

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag