Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 221

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $2,309,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
21James F Huggins JrMullins, SC 29574$27,840
22Bruce G Price & SonsLittle Rock, SC 29567$27,322
23Jeff Price And SonLittle Rock, SC 29567$26,852
24James L HayesLatta, SC 29565$24,805
25Rhett S ColemanDillon, SC 29536$24,027
26Jimmy C Bailey JrNichols, SC 29581$23,910
27Jerry A JonesDillon, SC 29536$23,284
28Alvie Dailey StricklandNichols, SC 29581$22,591
29Blake Mcintyre IIILexington, SC 29072$22,321
30Thaddeus StricklandNichols, SC 29581$21,758
31Jessie FordSellers, SC 29592$21,515
32Jonas T KennedyBennettsville, SC 29512$21,357
33Barry S WilloughbyNichols, SC 29581$21,038
34Blackwater LLCAynor, SC 29511$20,510
35L & J FarmsBennettsville, SC 29512$19,753
36E Michael Otuel IIIBennettsville, SC 29512$18,574
37C Douglas OtuelBennettsville, SC 29512$18,572
38David LovettLatta, SC 29565$18,016
39Harris S RichardsonBrittons Neck, SC 29546$17,832
40N & G Hog FarmHamer, SC 29547$17,807

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag