Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 353

Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $1,860,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Cotton Transistion Assistance Program
1995-2023
121Capher LLCBennettsville, SC 29512$1,270
122William Dean GrahamGreen Sea, SC 29545$1,226
123Charles D JohnsonConway, SC 29526$1,216
124Ronald Dock RabonAynor, SC 29511$1,212
125Wilton Shooter & Sns Fms IncRowland, NC 28383$1,197
126Walter ArnetteHamer, SC 29547$1,192
127David Rouse Farms LLCOrrum, NC 28369$1,172
128Michael S GeslingUnionville, VA 22567$1,169
129Wade H Crow Testamentary Trust U/Bennettsville, SC 29512$1,164
130James C TaylorGresham, SC 29546$1,138
131Michael K ReavesHamer, SC 29547$1,113
132Don H AtkinsonMullins, SC 29574$1,077
133Estelle C LinkWilmington, NC 28411$1,073
134Francis E Chamness Living TrustJacksonville, FL 32211$1,073
135John W ChamnessDublin, GA 31021$1,073
136John M Gasque JrDillon, SC 29536$1,037
137Neal Byrd Dba Partner FarmsMullins, SC 29574$1,036
138Rogers FarmBlenheim, SC 29516$1,030
139Daniel Wilson BaxleyDillon, SC 29536$1,027
140Wendell T PittmanHamer, SC 29547$1,025

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag