Total Disaster Programs in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,793
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $60,018,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Glasdrum Farms | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $315,231 |
22 | Betty Allen Farms | Latta, SC 29565 | $315,127 |
23 | Michael G Gibson | Marion, SC 29571 | $310,072 |
24 | W G Tatum Farm | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $300,056 |
25 | Keith R Elliott | Nichols, SC 29581 | $286,157 |
26 | Tim Johnson | Conway, SC 29527 | $279,702 |
27 | Steve Suggs | Green Sea, SC 29545 | $279,630 |
28 | Gerald R Wise | Marion, SC 29571 | $270,783 |
29 | Johnny M Shelley | Nichols, SC 29581 | $257,812 |
30 | David Stackhouse | Marion, SC 29571 | $255,021 |
31 | Larry Sarvis | Green Sea, SC 29545 | $253,917 |
32 | Thaddeus Strickland | Nichols, SC 29581 | $253,375 |
33 | Cameron E Huggins | Loris, SC 29569 | $251,820 |
34 | Jeffrey B Blanton | Mullins, SC 29574 | $243,941 |
35 | Stephen Mark Jolly | Nichols, SC 29581 | $243,910 |
36 | The Promise Land Stillwell Farms | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $238,926 |
37 | Michael B Stroud | Nichols, SC 29581 | $231,268 |
38 | William Danny Brown | Conway, SC 29526 | $229,495 |
39 | Douglas H & Margaret H Newton | Clio, SC 29525 | $228,488 |
40 | Danny Hammond | Nichols, SC 29581 | $227,668 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”