Production Flexibility Program in 8th District of Tennessee (Rep. David Kusthoff), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 12,283
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 8th District of Tennessee (Rep. David Kusthoff) totaled $176,180,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Larry J & Brenda J Bushart | Friendship, TN 38034 | $433,722 |
22 | John & Judy East | Friendship, TN 38034 | $430,658 |
23 | Peck Young & Sons Ptrs | Friendship, TN 38034 | $423,501 |
24 | Thompson Bros | Trenton, TN 38382 | $414,576 |
25 | Pugh Brothers | Halls, TN 38040 | $414,450 |
26 | Fincher Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $389,696 |
27 | Lee Farms | Ripley, TN 38063 | $383,469 |
28 | Parks Planting Co | Tiptonville, TN 38079 | $374,924 |
29 | David & Carol Cooke | Crockett Mills, TN 38021 | $367,573 |
30 | Ernest H & Donna Bushart | Friendship, TN 38034 | $363,018 |
31 | Finch Farms | Dyer, TN 38330 | $361,074 |
32 | T & G Farms | Ripley, TN 38063 | $351,918 |
33 | Fullen Ag Company | Ripley, TN 38063 | $347,641 |
34 | Edwin M And Jewel W Tritt | Bells, TN 38006 | $344,007 |
35 | Sanders Farms | Alamo, TN 38001 | $339,088 |
36 | J & S Fullen Farms | Ripley, TN 38063 | $335,260 |
37 | Manning Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $334,136 |
38 | Harden Farms | Stanton, TN 38069 | $329,358 |
39 | Mount & Mount Farms | Friendship, TN 38034 | $329,202 |
40 | Larry And Darlene Knox | Alamo, TN 38001 | $325,878 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”