Farm Subsidy information
11th District of Texas
(Rep. Michael Conaway)
Total Subsidies in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,426
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway) totaled $32,402,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Vickie L Strength | Cross Plains, TX 76443 | $306,711 |
2 | Sterling Cattle Co | Coahoma, TX 79511 | $268,808 |
3 | Slayton S Hoelscher | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $261,327 |
4 | Donop Ranch LLC | Brady, TX 76825 | $260,602 |
5 | Michael Hoelscher | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $257,553 |
6 | Cody A Weishuhn | Mereta, TX 76940 | $233,313 |
7 | , | $226,560 | |
8 | Mays Ranching Co Inc | Richland Springs, TX 76871 | $190,690 |
9 | Chris Fuchs | Eola, TX 76937 | $188,888 |
10 | Yme K Bosma | May, TX 76857 | $187,601 |
11 | Kris Wayne Scitern | Gorman, TX 76454 | $180,201 |
12 | Donald R Weishuhn | Eola, TX 76937 | $179,986 |
13 | Kelso And Prosise Farms | Paint Rock, TX 76866 | $179,637 |
14 | Lloyd R Vanzandt | Blanket, TX 76432 | $179,309 |
15 | Joe P Speck | Brownwood, TX 76804 | $177,356 |
16 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $170,232 |
17 | L & M Farms Inc | Mereta, TX 76940 | $164,204 |
18 | Paul N Williams Jr | Bronte, TX 76933 | $159,524 |
19 | Hudson Crowsnest Ranch Lp Dba Hudson Ranch | Miles, TX 76861 | $159,103 |
20 | Todd J Hamilton | May, TX 76857 | $154,837 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>