Conservation Reserve Program in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway), 2022

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 135

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway) totaled $1,134,000 in in 2022.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
2022
21Wayne A FindleyIredell, TX 76649$23,397
22John E SchuelkeSmithville, TX 78957$19,238
23Brenda PhillipsBay Minette, AL 36507$18,989
24The Blankenship Partnership LtdPlainview, TX 79073$15,664
25Gussett Land Development IncKerrville, TX 78028$15,177
26Phil DrakeMillersview, TX 76862$12,803
27Lonnie Dean ClarkLafayette, LA 70503$12,697
28John A Didway IIIBrownfield, TX 79316$11,610
29Willie G Davis Estate Gst Fbo William Malcom DavisRuidoso, NM 88345$11,526
30Willie G Davis Estate Gst Fbo Denise D SmithRuidoso, NM 88345$11,526
31Willie G Davis Estate Gst Fbo Lesli D DolgenerRuidoso, NM 88345$11,526
32Ernest ThorntonAndrews, TX 79714$11,352
33Joann L PflugerEden, TX 76837$9,403
34Michael EthridgeGraford, TX 76449$6,929
35Willie R SilerSan Angelo, TX 76904$6,574
36Joy M StoverTexarkana, TX 75503$6,434
37Darla J Sellers Irrevocable Asset TrustFort Worth, TX 76108$5,834
38Shirley Sue ShortesSeminole, TX 79360$5,739
39Mark H GullySan Angelo, TX 76905$5,089
40Judy NeufeldSeminole, TX 79360$5,083

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag