Total Conservation Programs in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway), 2022

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 136

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway) totaled $1,159,000 in in 2022.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
2022
21Debne C GregoryGeorgetown, TX 78628$23,397
22Wayne A FindleyIredell, TX 76649$23,397
23John E SchuelkeSmithville, TX 78957$19,238
24Brenda PhillipsBay Minette, AL 36507$18,989
25The Blankenship Partnership LtdPlainview, TX 79073$15,664
26Gussett Land Development IncKerrville, TX 78028$15,177
27Phil DrakeMillersview, TX 76862$12,803
28Lonnie Dean ClarkLafayette, LA 70503$12,697
29John A Didway IIIBrownfield, TX 79316$11,610
30Willie G Davis Estate Gst Fbo William Malcom DavisRuidoso, NM 88345$11,526
31Willie G Davis Estate Gst Fbo Denise D SmithRuidoso, NM 88345$11,526
32Willie G Davis Estate Gst Fbo Lesli D DolgenerRuidoso, NM 88345$11,526
33Ernest ThorntonAndrews, TX 79714$11,352
34Joann L PflugerEden, TX 76837$9,403
35Michael EthridgeGraford, TX 76449$6,929
36Willie R SilerSan Angelo, TX 76904$6,574
37Joy M StoverTexarkana, TX 75503$6,434
38Darla J Sellers Irrevocable Asset TrustFort Worth, TX 76108$5,834
39Shirley Sue ShortesSeminole, TX 79360$5,739
40Mark H GullySan Angelo, TX 76905$5,089

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag