Direct Payment Program in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,560
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway) totaled $75,692,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | David Kubenka | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $189,793 |
82 | Randy Gully | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $189,655 |
83 | Nolan B Niehues | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $189,418 |
84 | Mt Nebo Farms Inc | San Angelo, TX 76901 | $189,346 |
85 | Kenneth A Powell | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $185,260 |
86 | Jeffrey Schwartz | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $185,037 |
87 | Stanley J Werner | Miles, TX 76861 | $184,236 |
88 | Biedermann Farms Inc | Veribest, TX 76886 | $184,041 |
89 | Kenneth Montfort | Abilene, TX 79602 | $182,898 |
90 | Joseph Beach | Millersview, TX 76862 | $182,082 |
91 | Roger Strube | Wall, TX 76957 | $181,167 |
92 | Roy Book | San Angelo, TX 76901 | $180,396 |
93 | A & B Weishuhn Partners | Vancourt, TX 76955 | $177,764 |
94 | Karl D Weishuhn | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $177,126 |
95 | Yvonne Banta | Brownfield, TX 79316 | $177,013 |
96 | Bernie Fuchs Farms Inc | Eola, TX 76937 | $174,658 |
97 | Allen Gully | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $174,057 |
98 | A L Davis | Andrews, TX 79714 | $172,482 |
99 | Robert Biedermann | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $172,217 |
100 | Vivian Book | Miles, TX 76861 | $171,344 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”