Total Commodity Programs in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 2,139
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway) totaled $19,224,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Conner B Rabon | Miles, TX 76861 | $35,737 |
142 | William Kyle Smithwick | Miles, TX 76861 | $35,522 |
143 | Dee Dusek | Eola, TX 76937 | $35,157 |
144 | Gavin Schniers | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $35,139 |
145 | Marshall Tharp | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $35,120 |
146 | Ben & Betsy Wilde | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $35,074 |
147 | Clayton Weishuhn | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $34,897 |
148 | Bubenik Farms | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $34,790 |
149 | Brandon C Biedermann | Paint Rock, TX 76866 | $34,744 |
150 | Lipan Cattle Feeders, LLC | Veribest, TX 76886 | $34,692 |
151 | Curtis A Schwartz | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $34,621 |
152 | Kevin Niehues Farms Inc | Eola, TX 76937 | $34,614 |
153 | Bernard J Wilde | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $34,176 |
154 | Todd Schwertner | Miles, TX 76861 | $34,172 |
155 | Greg Hoelscher | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $34,052 |
156 | Justin P Sturm | Veribest, TX 76886 | $33,978 |
157 | J P Family Limited Partnership | San Angelo, TX 76903 | $33,934 |
158 | John E Schwartz Sr | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $33,857 |
159 | Koy Kellermeier | Mereta, TX 76940 | $33,451 |
160 | Darryl Weishuhn | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $33,014 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”