Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 413
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway) totaled $816,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Schlinke Dry Creek Ranch Lp | San Angelo, TX 76901 | $7,217 |
22 | Allen W Brenek | Wall, TX 76957 | $7,163 |
23 | George Sultemeier | Fort Mc Kavett, TX 76841 | $6,900 |
24 | Marshel Pennington | Menard, TX 76859 | $6,400 |
25 | George C Wenzel | Menard, TX 76859 | $6,360 |
26 | Larry D Slaughter | Odessa, TX 79765 | $5,999 |
27 | Stan Keen | Mertzon, TX 76941 | $5,355 |
28 | Max Menzies Estate Partnership | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $5,310 |
29 | R & J Livestock Co | Mason, TX 76856 | $5,306 |
30 | Barry Leland Sutton | Melvin, TX 76858 | $5,241 |
31 | Lee John P Estate C/o William Lee | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $5,117 |
32 | Joan Gentry | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $5,056 |
33 | Lucille Lammert | San Antonio, TX 78205 | $4,598 |
34 | Billie G Roddie | Brady, TX 76825 | $4,463 |
35 | David Lewis Bratton | Rochelle, TX 76872 | $4,373 |
36 | J R Grimshaw | Desdemona, TX 76445 | $4,347 |
37 | Don Bercher | Needville, TX 77461 | $4,253 |
38 | James L Davis | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $4,095 |
39 | Kathleen Huffman | Rochelle, TX 76872 | $4,000 |
40 | Sutton, John F Trust | San Angelo, TX 76902 | $3,973 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”